BMW E21
 
Navigation
 -Home
 -Search
 -News
 -Portal

Site Account
 -Login
 -Register
 -Online Users


Forums
 -General Forum
 -Tech Forum
 -News Archives
 -Cars

Files
 -Overview

E21
 -About
 -Parts
 -Funstuff
 -Classifieds
 -Links
 -Projects

Features
 -Unified
 -Hosting
 -Personal
 -Vin-checker
 -Events

Registry
 -Index
 -Thumbnails


Tech Forum : Changing diffs, gas efficiency decline?

- BMW E21 Community
   - Tech Forum
      - Changing diffs, gas efficiency decline?
g323   Posted Monday, Jun 11th 1:56am [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 171
   
California
323i 1982
my stock 3.25diff is leaking bad, thinking about replacing it with a 3.91 LSD. My top speed will go down, and so will my gas mileage no? but it will be more fun around town? Just want to check on these things, anyone have a guestimate on how much my gas mileage will go down?

myersport   Posted Monday, Jun 11th 2:15am [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 184
   
east tennessee
'82 320iS. '91 327iC
There have been different views on this, but I don't like the 3.91 with the m20. It makes it too high strung, especially with a 4-speed. It was better after I installed the 5-speed, but low end traction suffered. Too much gear for an effective launch. MPG will suck with a 4gear unless it's all in-town driving. My opinion only, does not necessarily reflect the opinions of this forum.
--Dennis

BruceH   Posted Monday, Jun 11th 5:18am [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 1127
   
Atlanta, GA USA
81 323 Baur, 85 745
I am 100% with Dennis on this. I have a 4 speed with the 3.45 and I cannot imagine the 3.90. First gear will be near useless.

ichiwan2   Posted Monday, Jun 11th 6:26pm [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 287
   
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
BMW320/6(e21)
U would probably get wheelspin with the 3.91.

Since your 3.25 is leaking, why not replace the seals/gaskets? Are the parts not available where you are?

Gabi_323i   Posted Monday, Jun 11th 8:13pm [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 133
   
Bucharest, Romania
11/80 323i 2.7i Motronic 1.3
3.25 on a e21???

g323   Posted Monday, Jun 11th 9:28pm [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 172
   
California
323i 1982
I have the dogleg sports 5speed gearbox and im assuming that came with the 3.25 no?
I want an LSD,

I would be happy if i can find a 3.45 on ebay and will look. I think It would be significantly easier for me to buy a 3.45 LSD on ebay and have it installed than to fix the one i have unfortunatly.

Fixing the one i have would be around 400usd with lost acess to car for a day-harsh-im in California in the Valley.

Installation of a new one would be 100dlls, and an LSD off ebay i can get i think for 300 or less.

3.45LSD with the dogleg then? good combo? could it be that i already have a 3.45, or did the dogleg always come with the 3.25. I dont know if this matters but i have the 323i sports suspension, ie the bigger sway bars and the stock bilsteins-i believe the car came this way...

myersport   Posted Tuesday, Jun 12th 4:15am [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 184
   
east tennessee
'82 320iS. '91 327iC
Again, the BMW ETK shows no reference whatsoever to a 3.25 ratio in the diff. It shows all 323i's to have a 3.45. I am not sure where this rumor started, but I have never seen evidence that it is true. You likely have a 3.45 diff.
--Dennis

Hartge82H3   Posted Tuesday, Jun 12th 5:00am [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 62
   
So Calif
82 Hartge H3 323irs E21
I'll chime in on this one. Having the dogleg attached to a 4:75LSD I can say 1st isn't useless, but it will redline quick if you aren't watching.
I made a video of my car and you'll get the idea what range the rpm's run normally. It's fun, but long distance interstate driving can make for a stiff back.
I'd think the 3:90 would be a good overall choice, without losing that much in gas vs what you gain in fun.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNS63mTx_jY

g323   Posted Tuesday, Jun 12th 9:55pm [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 173
   
California
323i 1982
About the 323i
The 323i also came standard with a 4-speed gearbox, however most 323i are equipped with a 5-speed overdrive gearbox. A dogleg close-ratio sport gearbox was available as an option.
The 323i has a 3.45:1 ratio on the differential. If fitted with a sport gearbox, the ratio was 3.25:1.

source- http://e21.tricord.be/e21/about/m20/gearbox-info.php

What is the part number on the seal that is probably leaking, i cant find the right diagram on realoem, anybody ever had one of these leak before. Its leaking from the front.

-g323

BruceH   Posted Tuesday, Jun 12th 11:11pm [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 1129
   
Atlanta, GA USA
81 323 Baur, 85 745
I am not aware of a 3.25 for the e21.

Greg323i   Posted Wednesday, Jun 13th 2:41am [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 363
   
Melbourne, Australia
1982 Hennaröt 323i
Disregard, I'm an idiot.

BruceH   Posted Wednesday, Jun 13th 4:50am [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 1130
   
Atlanta, GA USA
81 323 Baur, 85 745
Hartge82H3 wrote:
I'd think the 3:90 would be a good overall choice, without losing that much in gas vs what you gain in fun.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNS63mTx_jY

To each their own but I don't see it. Most of the m20 engines here aren't making much power past 5300 rpm. The 3.91 is going to put you out of the fat torque band.

pjs323i   Posted Wednesday, Jun 13th 9:33am [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 51
   
Canberra, Australia
'81 323i
g323 wrote:
About the 323i
The 323i also came standard with a 4-speed gearbox, however most 323i are equipped with a 5-speed overdrive gearbox. A dogleg close-ratio sport gearbox was available as an option.
The 323i has a 3.45:1 ratio on the differential. If fitted with a sport gearbox, the ratio was 3.25:1.

source- http://e21.tricord.be/e21/about/m20/gearbox-info.php

What is the part number on the seal that is probably leaking, i cant find the right diagram on realoem, anybody ever had one of these leak before. Its leaking from the front.

-g323

yeah its definatly short through the gears...

OT: love the exhaust note

Marquis_Rex   Posted Friday, Jun 15th 12:56pm [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 531
   
UK
BMW 323i 2.7-as featured in Total BMW Nov 2002,Porsche 911/993TT
It's a roughly linear relationship, according to an extensive vehicle study I did.

On a manual transmission car, a 10% numerically taller Final Drive ratio will improve fuel economy on motorway ahd highway cruises by about just under 6%
A 10% shorter FD ratio will decrease fuel economy by about just under 6%.


An automatic transmission shows less sensitivity, although it must be said that the study was carried out in 1997 and with alot of American vehicle data. Mainstream yank cars have/had prehistoric automatic transmissions compared to the state of the art Euro stuff, however this means it is probably quite relevant to our E21.

I did researh on the 3.25 rear end in an E21 and I think it was probably a myth propagated by the Haynes workshop manual for LSD cars.
Assuming it is a myth- going from 3.45 to 3.91 represents about a 13% change. So you can probably expect about a 7% drop in fuel economy.

MayanArch   Posted Friday, Jun 15th 3:23pm [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 1271
   
Florida, USA
Baur E21 2.7 1982, Baur E30 318i 1985, 323i 1978
BruceH wrote:
Hartge82H3 wrote:
I'd think the 3:90 would be a good overall choice, without losing that much in gas vs what you gain in fun.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNS63mTx_jY

To each their own but I don't see it. Most of the m20 engines here aren't making much power past 5300 rpm. The 3.91 is going to put you out of the fat torque band.


I am going to find out. I have a 3.91 LSD that I am going to put in with a 4 speed.

Should scream off the line. I dont plan for highway driving anyway. Top end speed is overrated. Shift, turn, accellerate, shift is where the fun is.

BarryA   Posted Friday, Jun 15th 10:48pm [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 194

Sacramento CA
81 320
May not be an issue in this case, but don't forget to factor in any pending tire/wheel diameter changes - I went from a 3.64 open diff in a US spec M10 320i with an OD 5 speed to a 3.91 LSD and replaced the 13" wheels and 185/70s with staggered 15's (15x6 & 185/60 front, 15x7 & 205/60 rear) at essentially the same time.

The end result was virtually zero change in rpm vs speed - the larger diameter wheel/tire combo exactly offset the lower diff gearing.

imaradiostar   Posted Saturday, Jun 16th 6:35am [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 1056
   
Nashville, TN
81 323i, 82 525i, 85 524td, 90 535i
i would argue that unless you're running an M20 with webers and a 300 degree duration camshaft a 3.91 is a complete waste of effort compared to the stock 3.45.

I think the 3.25 myth was propagated because of the E30 323i. I think (but haven't checked in ETK) the the E30 323i was equipped with a 3.25 when it had the dogleg box.

jamie

Hartge82H3   Posted Sunday, Jun 17th 7:05pm [Edit] [Quote] [IMS] [View car]
Member
Post nr. 63
   
So Calif
82 Hartge H3 323irs E21
MayanArch wrote:
Should scream off the line. I dont plan for highway driving anyway. Top end speed is overrated. Shift, turn, accellerate, shift is where the fun is.


That's what I'm talking about.....


Thread Administration
 

Copyright © 2001-2005 e21.tricord.be. All rights reserved. Powered by Unified.